Di - your response, and the responses of many other on all of my articles, is very indicative. We were talking specifically about genocide, and instead of continuing on this thread you went off on a total tangent spewing out stuff that is unrelated.

If you have ever read anything else I have ever written you would not be mentioning any type of support for Bibi.

So let's get back to the point we were talking about, that a lot of people called you out on. The definition of genocide, de facto and de jure, is quite clear. And, as Stephen's points out, using the term "genocide" as it is commonly thrown around in many circles, is a misappropriation. So how do you define it?